TV Review: Great Art (Series 3)
Share This Article:
The third instalment of ITV’s Great Art aired this month. Presented by broadcaster and Artistic Director of the Royal Academy of Arts, Tim Marlow, each episode offers an in-depth look at the lives and works of household names like Picasso, Goya, Munch, Monet, and Cézanne.
Van Gogh's Almond Blossom // Image courtesy of Seventh Art Productions
The programme goes behind the scenes at exhibitions at some of the world’s most prestigious galleries and uses this as a springboard to delve into each artist’s life, speaking to art historians, family members, and using letters and diary entries to fill in the details. As well as looking at these artists’ works, a significant part of each episode explores the artists’ influences – cities, families, lovers, friends. The places these artists lived in had a huge impact on their work. Spanish poet Manuel Rivas said, “a man’s homeland is his childhood”, which is certainly true for Pablo Picasso. Born in Málaga, he also lived in La Coruña and Barcelona, and the social contrasts of the latter were an influence on his work, particularly the Blue Period. Picasso settled permanently in Paris in 1904, where he changed “completely” as an artist; the difference between the culture in the French capital compared to Barcelona was immense at this time. Almost a century earlier, Francisco Goya travelled from Spain to Italy to study the old masters, while Edvard Munch got a scholarship to study painting in Paris after his first successful piece of work. In the French capital, he engaged in impressionism and other newer, more radical styles. For Claude Monet and his contemporaries, this sense of place was on a much smaller scale: the garden. The series stresses the ways gardening was an art form to these artists and describes Monet’s garden as a kind of “natural sculpture”. However, this episode, ‘The Modern Garden: from Monet to Matisse’, was probably my least favourite – it was too broad, featuring multiple artists, and lacked the depth of the other episodes. 50 minutes exploring the life of just Monet, for example, would have been much more rewarding.
- Article continues below...
- More stories you may like...
- 10 up-and-coming comedians to check out at the Fringe
- The only relationships on Love Island 2019 worth talking about are the girls' friendships
- I Am Hannah review - A sensitive and emotional portrayal of motherhood