Is Channel 5's Autopsy: Last Hours justified?
21st January 2014
Share This Article:
Many regard Michael Jackson and Whitney Houston to be two of the greatest musical entertainers of the twentieth century and arguably of all time. With a wealth of talent and inimitable style, they each brought something new to the world whether it was a flawless falsetto, cinematic music videos or high-energy performances accompanied by unscathed vocals.
Sadly, their names have been eternalised under one common factor: their shocking, tragic and untimely deaths.
On the 25th June 2009, we were all stunned to hear of Michael Jackson’s sudden death, which came as a huge blow to many of his fans and more so those who were expecting to see him in the 50-date showdown This Is It. It is coming up to five years now – it’s been a while, hence many were shocked to find that Channel 5 would be airing a documentary purely based around the findings from the autopsy report of the deceased celebrity.
It’s old news, many exclaim! We know he died from some kind of drug overdose and for a celeb this is no odd occurrence. The ‘immediate cause of death’ as stated in the coroner’s report was "acute propofol intoxication" (a powerful anesthetic typically administered to patients during medical operation).
What, then is the point?
From the perspective of a documentary-fan, perhaps we could see the Autopsy series as being an interesting watch, factual, educational and an insight into the human anatomy.
Then again, it’s common knowledge that Michael Jackson (often referred to as The King of Pop) was not just a body but a cultural icon who many held and still hold with the deepest affection.
Autopsy: Michael Jackson’s Last Hours sent Twitter ablaze with everything from rage to nostalgia. Ofcom received an ample number of complaints in response to the show’s bare-all nature. It appeared that Channel 5 left no stone unturned, featuring photos of Jackson’s corpse and LAPD photos of the star’s bedroom, without sparring details of an enlarged prostate.
Esteemed pathologist Dr Richard Shepherd, who famously conducted the inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Mr Dodi Al Fayed, hosts the documentary. He knows his stuff and it’s all really tense as he sits in a static position in an extreme close up, often narrating the most horrific health conditions so matter-of-factly. With the help of illustrative diagrams, real-life photos and easy-to-follow explanations of conditions including lupus and osteoarthritis, several viewers took to social networking hailing the show as a fascinating watch.
However, many took the issue with what they felt was an insensitive and ‘over-clinical’ treatment of death.

- Article continues below...
- More stories you may like...
- Crowdfunding a degree: selfish or a stroke of genius?
- Is Google's 'right to be forgotten' a gag order for the media?
- How social media proved that for many abortion is still a dirty word
You might also like...
People who read this also read...
TRENDING
TRENDING CHANNELS
CONTRIBUTOR OF THE MONTH