Mary Queen of Scots review - historically inaccurate and overly sentimental
Share This Article:
Verdict: Not for anyone who would be bothered by historical inaccuracies Directed by Josie Rourke in her film directorial debut, Mary Queen of Scots follows the life of Mary Stuart, Queen of Scotland (Saoirse Ronan) and her cousin Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie) as they fight for ownership of the English throne. It’s a story as well known and as ingrained in British history as Henry VIII and his wives – so why take such a classic tale and go against everything we learnt at school? The film begins with Mary being executed (this isn’t really a spoiler - it really happened over 400 years ago) and then flashes back 25 years to when she first arrives back on the shores of Scotland as a young woman.
Academy Award-nominated leading ladies, Mary Queen of Scots should have been incredible. It'll probably still get an Oscar nom, as Hollywood loves a British period drama - but whether it deserves to be nominated is another question entirely.
Mary Queen of Scots is out in cinemas on 18th January 2019.
Photo credit: Universal PicturesShe is around 18 at this point, and though she ages throughout the film there is no effort made to make Ronan look any older. In the execution scene, Mary is supposed to be 44 and has been imprisoned for several years, yet she appears with an immaculate complexion, not a grey hair or wrinkle in sight. The worst mistake in Mary Queen of Scots is the portrayal of Elizabeth I. Throughout history she is known to be totally formidable. A fearless leader, and one of the best queens this country has ever known – so why does Robbie’s Elizabeth behave like a snivelling wreck?
- Article continues below...
- More stories you may like...
- Red Joan review - a fascinating true story that falls a little flat
- Guava Island review - Donald Glover and Rihanna find music in a restrictive tropical paradise
- Are the Oscars still #SoWhite? Green Book and the white saviour problem in Hollywood
Photo credit: Universal PicturesIt’s surprising watching it that this film had a female director since it seemed so vehemently to enforce the male gaze, showing that despite these two women being strong(ish) and capable – they would never be as capable as men. There are also two rape scenes, something that is completely unnecessary – gratuitous sexual violence on the screen should have stopped with Game of Thrones. Despite all of this, Mary Queen of Scots is not a terrible film. Aesthetically it’s breathtakingly beautiful, filmed against a backdrop of the Scottish countryside. Saoirse Ronan is fantastic as Mary, commanding the screen in every scene she’s in. She’s particularly enigmatic in the early parts of the film, where she is confronting John Knox (David Tennant) in a tense scene, which acts as the catalyst for the events later in the film. The supporting cast is fantastic. Gemma Chan (Crazy Rich Asians) is sensational as Elizabeth Hardwick, Elizabeth I's right-hand woman. Despite the dismal script leaving her with around five words to say in total, Chan has the ability to own the screen with just a look. Jack Lowden (Dunkirk, War & Peace) as Mary's husband Lord Darnley is equally great, he plays the egotistical, drunk misogynist with ease - managing the difficult feat of playing a character so vile but making him somewhat likeable. All in all, with its stellar supporting cast and
Lead image credit: Universal Pictures
You might also like...
People who read this also read...
CONTRIBUTOR OF THE MONTH